Archive for advertising
Mini Cooper Ad Campaign: Opting for Edginess
Posted by: | Comments
Have you seen the Christmas ad campaign that Mini Cooper did in Amsterdam? Paul Williams captures it well on Marketing Profs’ Daily Fix.
I’m sure there are plenty of bloggers breaking down the greatness of this campaign. What I wonder is how close this campaign came from getting nixed.
Think about it. Some genius brought the idea to the table, and then I’m sure there were some people with influence who’s first instinct was to break it down, play it safe or dilute its strength.
- Couldn’t we put a little more copy on the box?
- How is this going to do more for us than a great commercial?
- Why would we want to associate our product with garbage?
You’ve experienced this, from either one side of the tracks or the other. We love to castrate creative greatness; it seems instinctive. We simply can’t help but move things from the edge to the center.
But people don’t stop and look at things in the center. The center demands absolutely no attention. Only edginess works.
Kudos to everyone at Mini Cooper for not letting your instinct to be centered keep a great idea from the world. Be sure to watch the video on Paul’s post. Notice how many people stop and look at the box over a two-minute span. That’s penetration, my friend.
Yo Quiero Fat Loss: the Taco Bell Diet
Posted by: | CommentsWhen I recently asked for some post ideas from my Twitter followers, I got this question from my good friend Fred Cunha, the mad man behind HelpMeFred.com:
So have you read about the Taco Bell Drive Thru Diet? To be honest, you probably don’t have to read anything to think it’s ridiculous to hear “Taco Bell” and “Diet” in the same breath. I’m actually pretty excited: I’ve been on the Taco Bell diet for years and had no idea.
It looks like Taco Bell is trying to position itself as the lesser of two (or twelve) evils here. “If you’re going to get fast food, here are some relatively healthy choices.”
But let’s face it: the Taco Bell brand position is not about eating well. It’s about cheap, good, cheesy food. It’s about late night college runs for a box of tacos. It’s for fighting off the munchies. It’s about a talking chiauhua. It’s about thinking “Outside the Bun.”
Of course, the real ironic thing here is that Taco Bell launched the “Fourth Meal” campaign just a few years ago, which I don’t believe is a popular notion of too many diet books out there.
The AdAge article is pretty interesting. Here’s what stands out to me:
- Taco Bell’s version of Jared Fogle, Christine Dougherty, explains that she “exercised and cut her daily caloric intake from 1,750 to 1,250 per day….” Ummm, cutting 500 calories from your diet will help you lose weight regardless of what you eat, for the most part.
- One of the secrets to the diet appears to be “replace salsa for cheese or sour cream.” Really? C’mon ….
- The reaction of the web is extremely interesting, as the article notes that chatter has increased 44% but that the tone has decreased in positivity by 6%, which actually moves Taco Bell into the lower echelon among fast food joints as measured by this stat.
- A dietician from the NBA’s Portland Trailblazers is actually endorsing this program. Is there now any wonder why Greg Oden can’t stay healthy for a full season?
Bottom line, Taco Bell is crossing a line that doesn’t make sense, and people are reacting. Whether on purpose or not, the perception here is that Taco Bell thinks we’re idiots and that they can just use jedi mind tricks to make us think they’re healthy.
Here’s a litmus test: try lowering your caloric intake by 500 calories while also foregoing the Taco Bell. My bet is Ms. Dougherty would’ve lost more than 54 pounds.
How to Make an Advertising Kit
Posted by: | CommentsI like what Michael Hyatt is doing.
Yes, you can take that to the bank as a general statement, but I love how he’s handled his advertising rate kit. Yes, I know, this is somewhat standard for large website, but this kit is loaded with tons of specific info about Michael’s site. The fact that he surveyed his readers and then is so upfront with his site’s demographics and stats make deciding on advertising here pretty simple. You know exactly what you’re going to get.
Hold on to this link; it’s a great standard to both follow for yourself or to know some common rates out there.
Infomercials, Billy Mays and the ShamWow
Posted by: | Comments
Fortune magazine has an extremely interesting article on the direct response advertising industry with interviews with Billy Mays, Anthony Sullivan and Vince Offer. In addition to a great behind-the-scenes look at the growing industry, and a he said/she said spout between competitors Offer and Mays, I took away these key points on the real heart of how these guys make things happen:
- The pitchmen usually make between 3% and 5% of total sales for the product their hawking.
- Retail store sales actually accounts for 90% of As Seen on TV products.
- Mays goes through his three-part formula for a great pitch.
- The Discovery Channel is actually launching a reality show called Pitchmen soon.
So, what’s your favorite infomercial? Would you ever use one for your product?
Denny’s is Doing it Right
Posted by: | CommentsYou gotta love what Denny’s is doing with their advertising. 
First, if you missed it during the Super Bowl, Denny’s is offering a free Grand Slam Breakfast to anyone on Tuesday, Feb. 3. No strings. Here’s what I love about this bold move:
- The economy sucks, so free food is always welcome (it’s welcome even when the economy doesn’t suck). Denny’s is capitalzing on this challenge, not hiding from it.
- Their driving trial, reminding people of just how good their breakfast is, while probably conjuring up some nostalgic memories in the meantime.
- Their letting advertising do what it does best, which is make consumers aware of something. It will be pretty easy to measure how effective this campaign is by seeing how many free breakfasts are given out tomorrow. In turn, we’ll see how good Denny’s is by seeing how many people come back when it’s not free.
At $3 mil. a pop, you can’t mess around with a Super Bowl ad. Denny’s is making the most of it. Too often, we expect advertising to make our product great. But advertising, at least these days, can’t do that. It can only call attention to the product. Then the product actually has to be great.
The buzz alone could pay off. As of 12:30 on Feb. 2, there were more than 1,300 blog entries for Denny’s free grand slam.
In addition, I’ve been loving Denny’s ads lately. A direct hit on all the sugary froo-froo coming out of IHOP.
So, will you be eating at Denny’s tomorrow? Do you think this kind of approach will work?
The Goal of Super Bowl Ads
Posted by: | CommentsReading through Bruce Horovitz‘ article in USA Today titled Marketers Face Pressure to Deliver with Super Bowl ads, I ran across a few interesting resources:
- The full roster of Super Bowl advertisers
- Marketers are spending $100k per second.
- Clients are scrutinizing over agencies’ work much more than ever.
- Last year, about 300,000 Super Bowl viewers who saw Hyundai’s ads went online before the game was even over to leave their addresses to get more information, says Ewanick. This year, Hyundai expects an even larger online response during and after the game with its “Assurance” spot.
But what really stuck out to me was the claimed goal of these ads. Says Horovitz:
“The common goal: $100,000-a-second worth of ad buzz. Buzz means Web hits after the game and, in good times anyway, that translates into sales.”
While I know it’s true, and became increasingly evident in last year’s ads, I feel as though admitting that the goal is getting web visits, then sales, is a pretty big statement.
So what does it mean? Well, it makes sense for companies like GoDaddy and SalesGenie to be advertising, given their product is bought online. Consumer goods like beer and cola still have to drive people to stores and vending machines after they hit the web for all the buzz.
It also means that media is being looked at in a much more comprehensive way, which is a good thing. It’s not so much about which medium works better: radio, print, broadcast, internet . . . , but rather how can we use them all together to best communicate what we need to communicate.
Finally, Horovitz’ main point is how our current economy raises the stakes as to the results that must come from a $3 mil. 30-sec. spot. Looked at another way, though, it could be worth it more than ever this year, as many regulars in Super Sunday advertising like FedEx and General Motors pass on the opportunity.
I don’t know that 30 seconds of anything is worth $3 mil. And to be honest, if you want to do it right, you really need about 5 minutes worth of spots scattered throughout the game, which equates to $30 mil.
But, if you think it works, then I believe this year presents many more opportunities to the brave and risky than any other year in recent history.
‘Trust Me’ and TV’s Advertising Future
Posted by: | Comments
I didn’t catch the premiere of Trust Me on TNT last night, but I did happen upon Junta42’s post on their innovative approach to advertising with the show. In a nutshell, the show centers around an ad agency. The agency is developing campaigns for actual products on the market today from companies like Unilever, General Motors and Anheuser-Busch.
Joe’s post at Junta42 goes into more details, but here’s my initial reaction: If network TV makes its money off of advertising, and if this example of ‘Trust Me’ captures the trend-to-be, then won’t we see a major shift in the settings of popular shows? It’s a lot easier to write in consumer products into a show about an ad agency than, say, a group of people stuck on an island since 2004.
What do you think?
Related Posts on MarketingInProgress.com:
The “Ear Rental Business” – an interview with Phil Bernstein, part 2
Posted by: | CommentsBelow is part 2 of my email interview with Phil Bernstein. Be sure to check out part 1 of the interview here, and come back for the final piece of this enlightening time with Phil. Also, all apologies on not posting last week: I managed to get a little sidetracked with having a baby last weekend. They say that can happen.
Brett Duncan: What are the keys to a successful radio ad campaign? How long should it last? Whatʼs this normally cost?
Phil Bernstein: Roy Williams taught me this: Results = what you say multiplied by how often you say it. If your story doesn’t interest your prospects, they won’t respond no matter what medium you use. And if you don’t tell the story often enough to cut through all the other messages your customers are exposed to, they won’t even notice that you’re talking to them. So the copy is vitally important, and then you’ve got to buy as much frequency as possible.
As for how long the campaign should last, in big-picture-terms, the answer is “forever”. McDonald’s has been advertising since the 1950’s — everybody in the country knows who they are, what they serve, and how to find one. And they still advertise every single day of the year.
How long a campaign will take to deliver results depends on the sales cycle of the product. A restaurant looking to increase dinner traffic could start seeing results in a day, because people need to eat every evening, and a restaurant visit can be an impulse decision; but those results won’t last unless they keep the advertising going. On the other hand, a campaign for a big-ticket product or service might not show tangible results for several months — most people who hear the ad on any given day aren’t in the market that day. The goal is to keep talking to the prospects until something moves them into the “active” category.
BD: Are there any industries or types of businesses that, over time, you realize probably shouldn’t use radio as part of their marketing mix? In other words, is radio right for everyone, or is there a group that it definitely doesn’t work for?
PB: Really specialized business-to-business companies (Roy Williams uses dental equipment sales as an example) are not appropriate for mass-market advertising. Manufacturing companies who sell only to other manufacturers can’t use radio to sell product — but they may be able to use it for recruiting workers.
—————
BD: What makes radio a viable medium today? What can advertisers do with radio that they canʼt do anywhere else?
PB: Radio’s big advantage has always been, and continues to be, the fact that it’s the one medium that can reach customers while they’re doing something else. You can’t watch TV while you’re driving; you can’t read the paper while you’re working in the garage; a direct-mail piece won’t reach someone who’s gone to the beach. Prospects are a moving target, and radio follows them.
BD: This is something I’ve never really thought of, but so true. With this said, how is text messaging changing how stations work and how radio ads work? I’ve been hearing more and more stations incorporating text into their programs.
PB: Text messaging is a great way to reach the younger end of the market. Z100, our hit music station, uses it for contests all the time. Some of our advertisers are incorporating text messaging into their radio campaigns — a mexican restaurant, for example, tell listeners to text the words “combo platter” to our text message number to receive a “text coupon” good for a discount. They then go to the restaurant and show their cell phone screen to the waiter to get the deal. I’m doing a program with the Oregon Elections Division in which listeners can request text message updates on things like voter registration deadlines.
—————
BD: How have podcasts affected radio? It seems to me that podcasts still havenʼt caught on like other Web 2.0 media. Is that what you see, or is it actually growing? What opportunities for marketers do you see in podcasts?
PB: I think podcasts are beginning to take hold, but nobody’s quite figured out how to turn them into a substantial revenue stream yet. The audience is growing, but listeners don’t expect to pay for podcasts, and it’s not clear at this point how much advertising they’re willing to accept. Here’s an example of the challenge: I love the fact that I can listen to “This American Life” whenever I want on my Ipod, and skip the pledge drive. My local public radio station isn’t so enthusiastic. People much smarter than me are working on that.
________________
Be sure to read part 1 of this interview, and part 3, coming soon. And don’t forget to visit Phil’s site.
The “Ear Rental Business” – an Interview with Phil Bernstein, Part 1
Posted by: | Comments
Brett’s note: One of the first blogs I read when I dipped my toe in the blogosphere’s waters was Portland’s Finest Advertising Blog by Phil Bernstein. I still read it today. Phil Bernstein was gracious enough to entertain my own curiosities a few months back, interview-style, and I wanted to share it with you in this 3-part series which will post on the Mondays of the next few weeks. Chime in, and be sure to dig into the greatness that is Phil’s blog.
Brett Duncan: You call yourself Portland’s Finest Media Rep, but what does that mean exactly? Give us a brief background of what you do, where you work, who you work with and your area of expertise.
Phil Bernstein: I’ve been working in sales/marketing/advertising in one way or another since 1984. For the past 13 years, I’ve been selling radio advertising for what is now Clear Channel — representing five radio stations and their online equivalents. I like to say I’m in the “ear rental” business — my clients rent the attention of our listeners for 15, 30, or 60 seconds at a time. My job, in oversimplified terms, is to design campaigns that cause our listeners to give their money to my clients.
When people enter my business, they receive a lot of sales training, and tools to help them convince businesses to buy radio advertising. But there’s very little training on how to write good copy. This means that a lot of good money is wasted on advertising that doesn’t work. I’ve put a lot of my own time and money into learning how to write advertising copy that sells.
BD: Obviously, you can’t just summarize everything you’ve learned about great copywriting into three to four sentences, but could you point out four or five areas or lessons that you feel are either crucial to success or that are repetitively overlooked by advertisers?
PB: My white paper goes into a lot more detail on these, but here are the most common things to watch out for on the copy front:
- Simple is good. When clients listen to their commercial, it is the most important thing in the world to them at that moment. When the ad actually plays, the audience is driving, or working around the house, or hanging out with friends at the beach. A complicated message is simply lost on them, because other things are competing for their attention.
- The ad needs to be about the prospect, not about the advertiser. “Nobody buys a quarter-inch drill bit because they want a drill bit. They buy it because they want a quarter-inch hole.” I’ve heard this quote attributed to five different people over the years, but whoever said it first, it’s worth remembering. Too many commercials are about the drill bit.
- Write the way people talk. Especially if it’s a “dialogue” spot.
- Make sure there’s a clear call to action. Ask yourself what you want the prospects to do after hearing your ad — and then tell them how to do it.
BD: So where did the “Portland’s Finest” originate?
PB: The “Portland’s Finest Media Rep” thing started in the late ’90’s. I’d read a Jeffrey Gitomer column in which he recommended finding ways to make every customer interaction memorable. So one day, almost as a joke, I put “Portland’s Finest Radio Rep” under my name on a fax cover sheet. I got an immediate call back from the client, demanding to speak to “Mr. Finest”. So I left it on the fax template — and added it to my letterhead, my outgoing voice mail message, my email signature, and everything else I could think of. Eventually I talked my bosses into letting me put it on my business cards. The license plate on my car now says “FINEST”, too. When we morphed into an online company, I adjusted the title to “Portland’s Finest Media Rep.” Everyone ought to have a personal brand, and this one’s mine.
BD: This seems to point out the importance of personal branding. Any comments on the importance you place on people, not simply businesses, branding themselves, especially in a service-driven industry?
PB: In advertising, you need to approach this with caution — if you feature one of your employees in your ads and the employee leaves, you’ve got problems. On the other hand, I think good people in the service industry should be able to capitalize on their skills, and the reputation they’ve built. Done properly, it’s good for the employee and for the company.
————————
BD: Where does radio advertising fit into the overall scheme in a 2.0 world?
PB: The 2.0 world has given everyone a lot more choices in where to get their music, information, and entertainment. Radio is one of those choices. If we don’t give listeners what they want, there are lots of other places they can go: Ipod, satellite radio, and the internet. In my own business, it’s more important than ever to make sure that my clients’ commercials tell the stories effectively. Ten years ago, just about all commercials were 60 seconds long. We now do a lot of :30’s, and I’ve become a big fan of :15’s — there’s significant recall research that indicates that in the right circumstances, a :15 is as effective as a :60. In a short-attention-span world, you’ve got to get to the point before your prospect loses interest, and a :15 forces you to do that.
BD: So what’s a great example of some good :15 spots? Any links to them? I’m assuming a :15 spot requires the marketer to make some choices in what they communicate, versus :30 or :60. What are the most common choices you see in this instance. Also, can you share any nuggets of the research you refer to?
PB: What makes a :15 work so well is that it forces a marketer to choose one thing to talk about — you simply can’t cram a laundry list of features into fifteen seconds. It won’t work for everybody — if you need to educate consumers on a new concept, or if there’s a legal disclaimer involved (common in auto dealer advertising), you’re going to need more time. But if you’ve got a simple value proposition to offer, you may be able to tell the whole story in fifteen seconds and buy a lot more commercials for your money.
A few years ago my company hired Burke Research to conduct some listener recall research in nine different markets. Among the variables tested were commercials of differing lengths. Overall, :15’s scored 94% of a :60 in ad recall, 78% of a :60 in copy point recall, and 110% of a :60 in brand recall.
I’ve attached an mp3 of a spot I did recently for a real estate company. It won’t win any creative awards – all it does is sell. We used the owner’s voice. In fifteen seconds, he:
- Lays out the problem — it’s tough to sell a house in today’s market.
- Offers a solution, and their unique selling proposition — Haskins Realty Group can sell your house, and will charge a lower commission to do it.
- Tells homeowners exactly what to do — call 503-255-5360.
YouTube, CBS Deal Marks the End of TV as We Know It
Posted by: | CommentsYouTube has struck a new deal with CBS to air full episodes of various series, including old episodes of MacGyver and Beverly Hills, 90210. Why they’re going with these oldies rather than more recent series, I don’t know. But that’s not the point here.
Hulu.com is forcing the industry to embrace the TV-to-web transition, while forcing ads to be shorter (15 secs in most cases). What’s it marks is the official end of advertising as we know it. The writing has been on the wall for quite some time, but we are now within, I believe, five years of traditional broadcast media being drastically weakened, if not obsolete.
On the positive side (not that the above isn’t), these new outlets are also opening up shows to more people than ever before, which will provide new opportunities for advertisers.


